Blows my mind when supposed music experts say something that completely and totally misses the point. Yesterday, on my way to work, I listened to a SoundCheck podcast where supposed music industry experts debated the following question:
Did the movie Juno deserve a “better” soundtrack?
Man, I just don’t understand how you could be further from the mark. Some guys were commenting that the soundtrack would be much more successful if it were primarily comprised of Belle & Sebastian tracks. Others were particularly not fond of Kimya Dawson, and her “under-produced, rough cut, unprofessional sound” and her “faux-juvenile lyrics.” Seriously? Did we watch the same movie? I’m sorry, but I think this soundtrack is not only amazing, but also VERY successful in sales, not to mention it’s perfectly matched to the subject matter of the movie. And, in terms of exposing a very large audience to an artist (and genre) they otherwise would not have heard, I’m personally very grateful to whomever made that decision. Think of all the kids in the world who were inspired by the Velvet Underground to go pick up a guitar and start making some music. I’m sure there are tons of other examples, and I hope Kimya Dawson has the same effect.
“Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A Start. Just because we use cheats doesn’t mean we’re not smart.”
Her stuff as part of the Moldy Peaches is great.